Overblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
12 mars 2013 2 12 /03 /mars /2013 02:58
South Africa’s agreement to buy more than half the power from the first stage of a planned $80 billion hydropower project in the Democratic Republic of Congo may be thecatalyst for expansion of the power industry throughout southern Africa, a government official said.
Bloomberg - Mar 11 12:50am
Partager cet article
Repost0
10 mars 2013 7 10 /03 /mars /2013 05:57
Susan Rice as national security adviser? U.N. ambassador said to be the front-runner.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/susan-rice-as-national-security-adviser-un-ambassador-said-to-be-front-runner/2013/03/09/3e54feba-8383-11e2-b99e-6baf4ebe42df_print.html

 

By Colum Lynch,  

UNITED NATIONS — Susan E. Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations who lost out in a bruising bid for the job of secretary of state, may have the last laugh.

Rice has emerged as far and away the front-runner to succeed Thomas E. Donilon as President Obama’s national security adviser later this year, according to an administration official familiar with the president’s thinking. The job would place her at the nexus of foreign-policy decision making and allow her to rival the influence of Secretary of State John F. Kerry in shaping the president’s foreign policy.

The appointment would mark a dramatic twist of fortune for Rice, whose prospects to become the country’s top diplomat fizzled last year after a round of television appearances in which she provided what turned out to be a flawed account of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.

That episode ignited a firestorm of criticism from Senate Republicans, who questioned her honesty and vowed to oppose her nomination and exposed misgivings from more liberal detractors who questioned whether her temperament, her family’s investments and her relations with African strongmen made her unfit to lead the State Department.

In plotting her political rehabilitation, Rice has kept whatever disappointment she may have felt in check, employing humor to blunt the indignity of the experience.

At the same time, her staff has sought to erect a more protective shield around her, moving to restrict access by mid-level foreign delegates suspected of leaking details about her more controversial positions and sometimes undiplomatic remarks in confidential deliberations at the United Nations.

Last month, Rice marked her reentry onto the national political stage with an appearance on Comedy Central’s “Daily Show” with Jon Stewart, a sympathetic host who denounced the “malevolence” of her Republican critics and urged her to respond with her trademark cussing. “What would you say to them?” he asked. “And feel free to talk like a sailor.”

In December, just days after she withdrew her name from consideration for secretary of state, Rice made a showing at the U.N. Correspondents Association annual ball, where she assured U.N.-based reporters and diplomats she was not disappointed to be sticking around the United Nations for a while longer. “There is no place in the world I’d rather be tonight,” she said. The punch line appeared on a screen behind her: a picture of the State Department.

Rice made light of reporting highlighting her support for controversial African leaders, including Rwandan President Paul Kagame, whose government stands accused of backing a brutal insurgency in the neighboring Democratic Republic of the Congo: “I’m amazed by some of the work you do — absolutely incredible. Some of you have been able to uncover things about me that I didn’t even know about myself. Seriously, even I didn’t know that I once lost a human-heart-eating contest to Idi Amin.”

Rice, 48, has largely fallen below the media’s radar, but her standing within the Obama administration remains secure, according to White House officials and Democratic lawmakers. Her U.N. colleagues are betting she will ultimately serve as Obama’s national security adviser, probably sometime after the United States assumes the rotating presidency of the U.N. Security Council in July.

“I think that Susan always maintains close relations with the president and his national security team, and that continues to be the case,” said Ben J. Rhodes, the spokesman for the National Security Council. “If anything, the way she handled the Benghazi situation — and then the withdrawal — only enhanced her relations here, because she did so with grace and good humor.”

Democratic lawmakers said they believe the controversy over Benghazi has largely subsided. The post of national security adviser does not require Senate confirmation, giving the president wider scope to appoint whomever he wants.

“I think people have moved on with Benghazi as it relates to Susan Rice,” said Rep. Eliot L. Engel (N.Y.), the ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “In the general course of events, it has not weakened her at all. I think the president has confidence in her, and she serves at the pleasure of the president.”

Several Republican lawmakers, including Sens. John McCain (Ariz.) and Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.), who previously made clear their opposition to Rice as secretary of state, did not respond to requests for comment for this article. Other conservative critics suggested the stain of the Benghazi remarks — in which Rice suggested the attack appeared to have grown out of a “spontaneous” protest over an ­anti-Muslim video — endures.

“I suspect that Ambassador Rice will never recover from her performance on Benghazi,” said Danielle Pletka, vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. “Luckily she’s a young woman, and there will be future administrations. But in this one, I suspect she’s not going to go anywhere that requires confirmation.”

At the United Nations, Rice — who is set to become the longest-serving U.S. ambassador to the United Nations since Henry Cabot Lodge Jr., who served from 1953 to 1960 — has continued to plow ahead, overseeing U.S. efforts to negotiate two sanctions resolutions on North Korea.

If the battle has left scars, her colleagues say they have not shown.

“Absolutely, chin up, raring to go,” said Hardeep Singh Puri, India’s U.N. ambassador. “She’s been very circumspect. The fact that something went wrong on this Benghazi matter is neither here nor there. The fact is that she is meant for big things.”

Diplomats say Rice’s bruising experience has not made her any softer, particularly in the case of a string of recent leaks.

After the disclosure of her opposition to sanctions against Rwanda, the United States lodged a complaint with France over suspicions of leaking and informed French officials that lower-level experts would not be allowed into meetings with Rice, according to Security Council diplomats. Her office also instructed the United Nations to restrict attendance to closed-door consultations of the Security Council after a leak detailing Rice’s support for a U.N. peacekeeping mission in Mali.

Rice declined to be interviewed for this article. Her spokeswoman, Erin Pelton, said: “Under Ambassador Rice, the United States negotiates privately and in good faith with our Security Council colleagues. We don’t leak the contents of often sensitive meetings because we don’t want to undermine the integrity and effectiveness of the negotiations.”

One council diplomat, describing Rice’s recent scrapes with other diplomats, said she remains “combative.” Rice herself is all too aware of such characterizations.

“People have called me brusque, aggressive, abrasive,” she joked at the U.N. correspondents ball. “Of course, they don’t say that to my face, because they know I’d kick their butts.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 mars 2013 7 10 /03 /mars /2013 05:53
Targeted killings have led to deadly practices in the past

 

http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/03/09/4671903/targeted-killings-have-led-to.html

 

Posted Saturday, Mar. 09, 20130 Comments Print Reprints

 A 
 

Have more to add? News tip? Tell us

sandersThe name Patrice Lumumba doesn't mean anything to most Americans today, and certainly not to most people in my home state of Texas.

But since this country was complicit in Lumumba's death -- his "assassination" -- this is a man weshould know, especially when we once again have given the president of the United States the authority to selectively have people killed.

Lumumba was a rising star in Africa, having helped his beloved Democratic Republic of the Congo gain its independence from Belgium in 1960 and becoming its first prime minister. His call for a unified Africa free of colonial control didn't sit well with many western leaders, and even President Dwight Eisenhower decided he needed to be "eliminated."

Although the CIA plot to poison him was not carried out, the U.S. helped foment dissension in the Congo, leading to Lumumba's being deposed, captured and killed by a firing squad under a Belgian's command late one night, just seven months after independence was won. He was 35.

Americans do know the name Fidel Castro. The United States had at least eight plots to kill him in the early 1960s. Needless to say, none succeeded. It was after revelations of the attempted Castro assassinations that President Gerald Ford issued an executive order prohibiting the practice, saying, "No employee of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in political assassination."

Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Regan confirmed the policy.

Things changed in 2001, after the 9-11 terrorist attacks designed by Osama bin Laden, when President George W. Bush declared war on al Qaeda and authorized "lethal covert operations" to get bin Laden, "dead or alive."

Bin Laden was killed by Navy Seals in 2011 at his Pakistani compound in an operation ordered by President Barack Obama.

In prosecuting the "war on terror" the Obama administration has ramped up drone attacks on "enemy combatants" in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. High-profile al Qaeda leaders have been killed under a policy in which the president gives final approval for the bombings.

This unconventional war against enemy groups and individuals rather than countries presents a huge ethical dilemma. I am troubled that anyone, let alone the president, can decide what individual ought to die.

That debate has been amplified as congressional leaders question whether the president has the right to order drone strikes on American citizens within the country. While I think that is a far-fetched idea, it is an important discussion to have.

Drone strikes ought to be bothersome even if you agree that certain identified terrorist leaders ought to be killed. Too often, they are not the only ones who die once a missile is fired.

A study by Stanford and New York University law schools points out that drone strikes are not necessarily clean surgical attacks that do no other damage. Citing statistics of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism based in London, the study reported that from June 2004 to mid-September 2012, "drone strikes killed 2,562 [to] 3,325 people in Pakistan, of whom 474-881 were civilians, including 176 children. Another 1,228 to 1,362 people were injured."

How much is too much "collateral damage" in such attacks?

We can't know everything about how our government works to protect us, but it seems when we condone state-sponsored killings there needs to be much more oversight.

And once we sanction it, we may be inviting others to follow suit.

That could mean a return to those days of the last century when targeting heads of state was easier and cheaper than waging all-out war.

No one wants to go back there -- right?

Bob Ray Sanders' column appears Sundays and Wednesdays.

817-390-7775

Twitter: @BobRaySanders

 

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 mars 2013 7 10 /03 /mars /2013 05:33

Nous proposons la création d'une école des ingénieurs miniers au Congo pour former les Congolais qui pourront eux-mêmes creuser nos minerais à  la place des "investisseurs"!!!

 

Quand est ce l'homme Congolais va-t-il se prendre en charge?

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 mars 2013 7 10 /03 /mars /2013 05:27
Why should every president of the World Bank be an American?
Is that democratic on the part of America which preaches democracy to others?
Why don't we just call it "American World Bank?"
(Elvis asked,)"But how is the World Bank responsible  if we mismanage the funds they give us?"
(King of Beggar answered)  "Funds? What Funds? Let me tell you, there are no bigger thieves than those World Bank people. Let me tell you how the World Bank helps us. Say they offer us a ten-million-dollar loan for creating potable and clean water supply to rural areas. If we accept, this is how they do us. First they tell us that we have to use the expertise of their consultants, so they remove two million for salaries and expenses. Then they tell us that the consultants need equipment to work, like computer, jeeps or bulldozers, and for hotel and so on, so they take another two million. Then they say we cannot build new boreholes but must service existing one, so they take another two million to buy parts. All this money, six million of it, never leave the U.S. Then they use two million for the project, but is not enough, so they abandon it, and then army bosses take the remaining two million. Now we, you and I and all these poor people, owe the World Bank ten million dollars for nothing. They are all thieves and I despise them--our people and the World Bank people!" 
footnote: Chris Abani, Graceland (New York: Picador, 2004), 280. 
Partager cet article
Repost0
10 mars 2013 7 10 /03 /mars /2013 05:16

Républiquette dans une République! A la place de Kinshasa, Satani Makenga "veut mettre la main sur Bosco Ntaganda pour le remettre à la justice internationale". Pendant ce temps, FDLR,ADF/NALU refont surface (fonds de commerce rwando-ougandais).  

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 mars 2013 6 09 /03 /mars /2013 10:09

Lettre ouverte au Chef de l'Etat Joseph Kabila Kabange: "Veuillez ne pas re-intégrer une fois de plus les soldats de Museveni et de Kagame au sein des FARDC". 

 

Son Excellence  Monsieur le Président de la République,

 

Avec tout le respect que je vous dois, d'abord en tant que fils de Mzee Kabila, héros national et deuxième grand révolutionnaire Congolais qui est desormais entré dans le panthéon des immortels à côté de Patrice Lumumba, puis évidemment en tant que Chef de l'Etat en exercice, démocratiquement élu; permettez-moi de saisir cette opportunity pour vous conseiller humblement de ne pas re-intégrer une fois de plus les soldats de Museveni et de Kagame au sein des FARDC. 

 

Je les fustige ce n'est pas parce qu'ils sont Rwandais et Ougandais per se, mais parcequ'ils se sont rendus coupables de crimes contre l'humanité au Congo. En plus je suis convaincu que les Tutsi ne sont pas extraordinaires par rapport à tous les autres Africains pour s'arroger le privilège de diriger l'Ouganda, le Rwanda, le Burundi, le Congo... par subterfuge ou par la force des armes leur prêtée par les puissances anglo-saxonnes, jouissant aussi la complicité de certains traître Congolais bien connus comme Lumbala, Amisi Tango Fort (pour ne citer que ceux-là) pour atteindre leur objectif.

 

Il évident que la dernière fois que les troupes Rwandaises et Ougandaises dirigées par Nkundabatware ont été intégrées au sein des forces armées dans le cadre des Accords de Sun City, vous conviendrez avec moi que le résulat      a été catastrophique!

 

Preuve à  l'appui,  Nkundabatware a récruté tous ces soldats 'CNDP' intregres au sein des FARDC au Rwanda (Fighters recruited from inside Rwanda's army have joined General Laurent Nkunda's rebels in Congo - Daily Telegraph, 20 Nov 2008).

 

Veuillez cliquer ici S.V.P.:

  

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/democraticrepublicofcongo/3488938/DR-Congo-rebels-recruited-from-Rwanda-army.html

 

Il est également évident que, toutes les ailes du M23 sont composées des troupes Rwandaises et Ougandaises. En effet, trois bataillons Rwandais ont ete projétés sur le territoire Congolais pour capturer la ville de Goma et ses environs. Des preusuves abondent et vous vous meme avez deja indexe le Rwanda et l'Ouganda comme agresseurs.

 

Veuillez cliquer ici S.V.P.:


http://blog.lesoir.be/colette-braeckman/2012/11/18/les-rebelles-aux-portes-de-goma-bloques-par-lonu/

 

Si  à la place d'accéler la formation d'une armée forte capable de ramener la guerre d' elle est venue sans quoi le Congo ne sera jamais en paix pour se développer, votre gouvernement persiste à re-intégrer les dits soldats Rwandais et Ougandais au sein des FARDC, et au cas ou l'histoire se répètera quand les mêmes causes produiront les mêmes effets, le jugement de l'histoire nous sera très sévère (nous nationalistes).

 

Veuillez agréer, Votre Excellence, l’expression de ma très haute considération. 

 

Patriote Lokongo

9 mars 2013.

 

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 mars 2013 6 09 /03 /mars /2013 07:05

Bertrand Bisimwa, nouveau leader du M23 dit qu'il ne peut pas dire si oui ou non il a pris l'argent de Kinshasa dans le cadre de leur deal: laissez-tomber la révendication du départ de Kabila.

 

Il fustige cet "intox" cousu selon lui de l'aile Runiga, le leader déposé du M23.

 

La paix s'achete-t-elle?

 

http://www.voanews.com/content/drc-rebel-leader/1618041.html 

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 mars 2013 6 09 /03 /mars /2013 06:48

Le Rwanda annonces qu'il va "tripler" ses revenues issues de la vente des minerais dont il ne dispose pas!

 

http://allafrica.com/stories/201303080142.html

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 mars 2013 6 09 /03 /mars /2013 06:39

Coopération Sud-Sud: Les premières visites officielles du nouveau President Chinois Xi Jinping l'ameneront en Russie, en Afrique du Sud, en Tanzanie et au Congo-Brazzaville.

 

Cliquez-ici:

 

http://news.yahoo.com/chinas-xi-visit-africa-u-frets-over-beijing-052617940--business.html

Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : Congo Panorama. Le blog du soldat du peuple: Par Antoine Roger Lokongo, le Soldat du Peuple engagé dans la bataille des idées pour un Congo meilleur. Un Congo qui s'assume et devient un parténaire clé de la Chine, hier un pays sous-développé, qui, en un lapse de temps, a changé son destin en comptant sur ses propres efforts et devenu une puissance.
  • : A partir des idées de mes héros, Patrice Emery Lumumba et Laurent Désiré Kabila, je suis l'actualité politique de mon pays, la République Démocratique du Congo en partuclier et de l'Afrique en général et je donne mes commentaires. Antoine Roger Lokongo
  • Contact

Hymne des Opprimés

  Ces CPP-ci sont la lumière des ouvriers
et des paysans,
ainsi que de tout opprimé.

Il n’y a point de doute d’abattre l’exploitation et de créer une juste société.

Notre serment est de ne jamais échouer,
enjoignons toutes nos forces en un faisceau,
tenons bien nos armes dans nos mains,
car ces CPP sont la force du peuple.


Dans sa noble cause,
jamais de spoliation.

Notre lutte revendique nos droits,
quoiqu’il en coûte,
jamais de servitude.


Pour les opprimés,
la Révolution est un rempart,
son ultime but est que le peuple gouverne.

Laurent Désiré Kabila,
lâchement assassiné le 16 janvier 2001.

Recherche

Liens Préféres